In a twist of political irony, Jack Schlossberg blasted Trump for turning JFK into a 'political prop' after the president signed an order to declassify files on the Kennedy and King assassinations—now coming soon to a news feed near you.

Jack Schlossberg, the grandson of John F. Kennedy, has sharply criticized President Trump for his recent executive order aimed at declassifying files related to iconic assassinations, arguing that the move is less about heroism and more about political theatrics. While Trump claims this decision serves the public interest—echoing his past reluctance to release such documents—Schlossberg contends it dangerously commodifies JFK's legacy, leaving everyone wondering if the files will be revealed in a flashy tweet or a primetime special.

Schlossberg stated that there is 'nothing heroic' about Trump's declassification move, which he views more as a ploy than an act of transparency. With accusations swirling, the grandson of the 35th president seems to suggest that utilizing a fallen leader's story for current political advantage might be a recipe for disaster. Perhaps in a world already overflowed with theatrics, adding JFK’s assassination files to the mix only diversifies the dramatic flair without substantiation.

The executive order, which calls for the declassification of documents surrounding the assassinations of JFK, his younger brother Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King Jr., also hints at an advisory timeline. Officials have a mere 15 days to present a plan for releasing the JFK files and an extended 45 days for the RFK and MLK files. One can only imagine the flurry of meetings and phone calls—'Did you see the latest JFK file? It's like a historical cliffhanger!' Trump's rationale centers on asserting that continued withholding of these records from the public is unsupported by the public interest. Ironically, the public may soon be doing its very best to ignore yet another political drama unfolding.

Interestingly, amidst this conversation, RFK Jr. has voiced his support for Trump’s order, labeling it a 'great move' that promotes 'more transparency.' It’s a unique moment in history where a descendant is endorsing a political decision that, in a roundabout way, involves his own family legacy. One might ponder whether transparency is merely a euphemism in the convoluted world of political narratives.

In a further twist, the family of Martin Luther King Jr. has expressed hope to review the files prior to their public release. Their eagerness to explore these historical documents signals a desire to reclaim their narrative, perhaps feeling the need to exercise caution in a situation where narratives can easily diverge. After all, a family's history shouldn’t be left to the whims of politicians, especially when they might spin it into a thrilling drama with cliffhangers.

It’s worth noting that Trump’s relationship with these files has not been straightforward. During his initial term, he opted against releasing JFK files, allegedly due to the considerable pressure from the CIA and FBI. Those days of misinformation led to endless conspiracy theories being manufactured like they were going out of style. Now, however, this new plan could either redeem his earlier hesitations or deepen the rabbit hole further.

While the public's yearning for transparency is genuine, the methods by which such revelations occur make every citizen squint suspiciously, wondering what's truly being revealed and what's conveniently left in the dark. In a time when the exchange of information often feels like a well-scripted play, one can only hope that the characters behind the curtain don’t twist the narrative beyond recognition. Jack Schlossberg has accused President Trump of using JFK as a 'political prop' with his declassification order, stating that there is 'nothing heroic' about it. Trump signed an executive order to declassify files related to the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and Martin Luther King Jr., but he previously blocked the release of JFK files during his first administration due to pressure from the CIA and FBI.

In closing, as we await the declassification, the historical implications may be grand, but the political ramifications seem equally so. Whether Schlossberg’s criticism resonates will depend on if the files stumble into the light of public scrutiny unscathed or if they become yet another tool in a broader game of political chess. However, one thing remains abundantly clear: chocolate-covered history is no substitute for sincerity, and only time will tell what flavors emerge from the legislative kitchen.