Ben & Jerry's Scoops Up Controversy with Unilever's Trump Gag Order
Ben & Jerry's is taking Unilever to court, claiming the frozen treat giant is melting its values by banning social activism and demanding silence on Trump, because what’s ice cream without a side of principles?
In a chilly legal battle, Ben & Jerry's is suing Unilever for allegedly trying to crush its independent spirit and silencing its social activism, particularly regarding President Trump. The ice cream company argues that Unilever's crackdown, which coincides with a planned spinoff of its ice cream brands, undermines its long-standing commitment to social issues—raising the question: can a cone be baked without a scoop of conscience?
Founded in 1978 by the dynamic duo Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, Ben & Jerry's has been known for its whimsical flavors and a socially conscious mission that could turn any dessert into a political statement. Fast forward to now, and it seems their parent company, Unilever, is less interested in politics and more focused on profits amid an apparent corporate restructuring—turning the lovable ice cream maker's mission into a somewhat tangled swirl of corporate strategy.
The heart of the matter lies in Unilever's ice cream chief, Peter ter Kulve, who has reportedly banned Ben & Jerry's from publicly criticizing President Trump, claiming it results from a 'new dynamic' brought on by impending restructuring. This move is deemed particularly puzzling since Ben & Jerry's has long made a name for itself by speaking out on social issues, including its high-profile decision to halt sales in the Israeli-occupied West Bank in 2021. They're no stranger to controversy, but one wonders how they’ll adjust to an ice cream landscape where quietude is the new flavor of the month.
Unilever, which purchased Ben & Jerry's in 2000, is now attempting to simplify its product portfolio—because who needs social consciousness when you can have simplification? This restructuring comes at a time when several companies have taken a step back from previous commitments, especially on hot-button topics like diversity. Some have deemed it necessary to appear deferential towards Trump, but the question remains: what happens when a company built on radical flavors is placed in the corporate cauldron of conformity?
In light of these events, Ben & Jerry's argues that the alleged requests from Unilever not only undermine their ethos but threaten their very identity as a company that prides itself on activism. "This isn't just about ice cream; it's about our moral compass," remarked a representative from the company. With ice cream revenues in the realm of €8.3 billion (approximately $8.72 billion) in 2024, it seems Unilever is swinging for the fences, hoping all that cash will smooth over the situation, while Ben & Jerry's just wants to keep its scoop of moral fiber intact.
The irony of a flagship ice cream company being effectively muzzled would certainly give pause to Cohen and Greenfield, whose flavors routinely push the envelope of societal norms. However, it’s not the first time ter Kulve has opted for a freeze on free speech, as he previously barred a planned social media post that dared to mention Trump upon his inauguration. A cake in the oven ought not to dictate how the cookies crumble, but here we are watching a slow bake-off between activism and capitalism.
The ongoing legal tussle is emblematic of the larger conversation taking place in boardrooms across the nation, as brands grapple with their identities amidst external pressures. As Unilever hunkers down to spin off its beloved ice cream brands—including Ben & Jerry's—into a standalone entity likely listed in Amsterdam, one can only hope that the allure of profit doesn’t overshadow the social impact each pint could wield.
Meanwhile, social media remains abuzz with fervent supporters of Ben & Jerry's philosophy, rallying behind the company’s mission to combine frozen dairy delights with social advocacy. However, as ter Kulve and Unilever navigate these choppy corporate waters, it may be some time before we see the conclusion of this creamy conflict. Will Unilever's restructuring reinvent Ben & Jerry's or result in an icy divide? Only time and maybe a court ruling will tell, but for now, pudding cups everywhere are on high alert—and who knows? Perhaps a new flavor is just waiting to be scooped up as the case develops.