Texas Megachurch Founder Indicted on Child Lewdness Charges

Texas Megachurch Founder Indicted on Child Lewdness Charges

3 minute read
Published: 3/13/2025

Robert Morris, founder of Gateway Church, faces five felony counts of lewd acts against a child, stemming from alleged abuse of a 12-year-old girl over four years, an Oklahoma grand jury announced.

The indictment, filed in Osage County District Court, underscores the serious nature of the allegations against Morris, who resigned from his ministry in June after acknowledging 'inappropriate sexual behavior' in the 1980s. With potential prison time of up to 100 years if convicted, the case not only raises issues of church accountability but also highlights a broader commitment from Oklahoma authorities, including Attorney General Gentner Drummond, to combat child sexual abuse.

The accusations against Morris revolve around incidents involving Cindy Clemishire, who claims the abuse began when she was just 12 years old in December 1982. According to Clemishire, the alleged misconduct continued until 1987 and took place in both Oklahoma and Texas. She has stated that Morris instructed her to keep the occurrences a secret, adding to the complexities of the case.

Clemishire expressed her gratitude towards law enforcement for their diligence in pursuing the case. "I just want justice to be served," she stated following the indictment. Her comments reflect a growing movement among survivors seeking accountability for perpetrators of abuse, particularly within institutions that are meant to uphold moral standards.

The legal proceedings against Morris are significant, particularly because the statute of limitations did not bar the charges due to Morris not residing in Oklahoma at the time. This exception allows for the prosecution to move forward despite the considerable time elapsed since the alleged incidents. In this case, legal technicalities play a crucial role in bringing historical abuse allegations to light.

Morris's resignation from Gateway Church came after he publicly confessed to what he described as inappropriate behavior over three decades ago. In his statement, he referred to the incidents as 'kissing and petting,' minimizing the gravity of the allegations. This characterization will likely be a point of contention in the court proceedings that lie ahead.

Gateway Church has publicly stated its intention to cooperate fully with investigators. Following Morris's resignation, the church has made changes to its leadership structure, including the removal of several elders. This action suggests a significant internal response to review its practices and policies in light of these serious allegations.

Attorney General Gentner Drummond remarked on the case, emphasizing the importance of holding accountable those who prey on children. 'There can be no tolerance for those who sexually prey on children,' he said. Drummond's statement highlights the efforts of law enforcement and the legal system to address sexual abuse, particularly when it involves figures of authority within community settings like churches.

Morris's involvement in national discussions around faith and politics, including being part of Donald Trump's spiritual advisory board during the former president's first term, adds another layer to this case. His prominence in these circles may amplify public interest in the indictment and its implications for leadership in religious communities.

As the case proceeds to Osage County District Court, it highlights the need for accountability within institutions that are traditionally trusted with vulnerable populations. The scrutiny on Gateway Church and Morris may prompt other religious organizations to evaluate their child protection policies and reporting practices.

In light of these developments, both the community surrounding Gateway Church and the broader public will be closely monitoring the legal proceedings. The outcomes of these charges could have lasting impacts on the church's reputation and its ability to address past abuses effectively, ensuring that such acts are acknowledged and addressed head-on.