Trump's Pen Strokes: Collective Bargaining Rights Evaporate

Trump's Pen Strokes: Collective Bargaining Rights Evaporate

3 minute read
Published: 3/28/2025

In a bold move to clear federal roadblocks, President Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that puts more than 1 million federal employees' collective bargaining rights on a 'national security diet.'

The order, which targets federal workers in key agencies like Defense and Justice, is Trump's attempt to remove perceived obstacles posed by unions to his agenda—labeling their collective bargaining as a threat to national security. The American Federation of Government Employees is already gearing up for a legal showdown, arguing that this move turns federal employees into the ultimate pawns in the administration's game of 'Who Can Squeeze More Power?'

With one stroke of his pen, Trump has redefined the landscape of federal employment, sailing past union protections like a ship through a foggy harbor. The freshly signed executive order is stated to prevent federal unions from obstructing the administration’s agenda, which can only be described as a twist on the phrase 'you can’t stop the progress' — assuming that progress equates to fewer rights for workers. The announcement sparked immediate protests behind the polished desks of union leaders, while officials in various agencies clutched their headsets, unsure of who to call for back-up.

The order applies to workers across several critical departments, including State, Defense, Justice, and Health and Human Services. It's almost as if Trump flipped through a federal employee directory and declared, 'You're all in!'. With the stroke of a pen, employees who once had a seat at the bargaining table now find themselves relegated to the status of a forgotten sandwich crust.

What does this mean for over 1 million federal employees? Well, collective bargaining rights have been effectively placed on a tight leash. Critics argue this limits their ability to negotiate wages and working conditions, ensuring that employees will have to rely on the government’s benevolence — a risky business plan in an administration that’s redefining what 'generosity' means. The rationale behind this move, as articulated by the White House, is that the necessity of national security calls for an agile federal workforce that can execute missions without the lingering threat of negotiations.

White House spokespeople were quick to articulate that federal unions, in their opinion, have declared war on the President's agenda, launching an arsenal of grievances and lawsuits against policies perceived as unfavorable. So, it seems unions have traded their labor rights for an imaginary battlefield where Trump declares victory on a daily basis, armed solely with an ever-expanding memorandum.

However, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) promptly condemned the order, vowing to fight back with legal action. AFGE President Everett Kelley pointed out that ‘The executive order is an unjustified attack on the rights of public servants who work tirelessly for the American people.’ Meanwhile, back at the White House, the team stands convinced that they are early pioneers on a new front against an invisible enemy — or unions, depending on who you ask.

Legal challenges to Trump’s sweeping actions are nothing new. Other federal unions have previously filed multiple lawsuits against his policies, resulting in mixed success. Temporary victories may fuel a flicker of hope among some, though the challenge now looms as the unions prepare to fight the ongoing fight, assuming the role of beleaguered knights defending their castle against an increasingly distant king.

Interestingly, Trump’s executive order is rooted in the authority granted by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. It’s quite the throwback — as if the President reached into a dusty drawer, pulled out a relic of bureaucracy, and thought, 'This’ll confuse them.' It remains to be seen whether this reliance on an old act can withstand the fresh scrutiny and societal winds that have only grown stronger since the ‘70s.

As the dust settles on this iconic move, one thing is clear: a new chapter in the story of federal employment is on the horizon. Will it be filled with transparency and collaboration, or will it devolve into a tale of endless litigation and grievance? Only time will tell, but for now, Trump has wrested the power of negotiation from the people who may have helped you through your last paperwork fiasco. Cheers to bureaucracy, or as they say at the White House, ‘Let the games begin!’