CBS CEO Quits, Cites 'Creative Differences' with News

CBS CEO Quits, Cites 'Creative Differences' with News

3 minute read
Published: 5/19/2025

Wendy McMahon has hung up her CBS News hat, citing creative disagreements with higher-ups and a recent $20 billion lawsuit, proving some leadership paths are less about journalism and more about juggling flaming torches.

McMahon's resignation, following the controversial departure of '60 Minutes' producer Bill Owens and amid a looming $20 billion lawsuit from Donald Trump, highlights the troubling climate at CBS News where creativity often took a backseat to corporate concerns. Her exit raises questions about the future of journalistic integrity at the network, as it grapples with a leadership vacuum and a commitment to keeping its flaming torches—err, reporters—safe.

McMahon described her time at CBS News as one of the most meaningful chapters in her career, which is a sentiment she expressed directly. It’s nice to hear McMahon kept some of the warm fuzzies intact amidst the turmoil.

The abrupt departure follows the high-profile exit of Bill Owens, a producer who had been at the helm of '60 Minutes' for a significant stretch. Owens cited a loss of journalistic independence as his reasoning, which could mean a variety of things—from disagreements over how an interview should be edited to, perhaps, an internal memo suggesting stories should be more about puppy rescue initiatives. Either way, such a loss seems endemic to a broader issue at CBS.

In her official resignation statement, McMahon noted the past few months had been challenging, a diplomatic way to say that discussions regarding the network's direction probably resembled a game of tug-of-war—with opposing sides maneuvering for control while trying not to tumble into a pit of fire. With both McMahon and Owens exiting the stage, one might wonder if there's an ongoing team-building exercise involving dramatic exits.

As if the circumstances weren't complicated enough, McMahon's departure coincides with a $20 billion lawsuit from none other than Donald Trump. The suit sprang from a '60 Minutes' interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, with Trump's team arguing that CBS misled the public by editing the content. McMahon undoubtedly felt the weight of such a lawsuit, leading her to lend an air of gravitas to the situation, as if the fate of journalistic integrity rested solely on her broad shoulders—which, by the look of it, might have already been pretty taxed.

Originally, Trump sought $10 billion, a mere pittance by today's standards, but later decided to double down and turn it into $20 billion. It seems he rather enjoys setting thresholds that hold the record for 'mostly absurd.' It’s a classic case of ‘one-upmanship’ that reads more like a Hollywood budget than a legal claim.

Meanwhile, CBS's parent company, Paramount Global, finds itself under pressure to settle the lawsuit quietly. This has led to conversations and mediation with Trump's legal team—presumably over coffee, scones, and the occasional passive-aggressive remark about editing practices. It’s as if every corner of the room holds a unifying theme: business is tricky when a legal hurricane is raging just outside the window.

Internal reports from the CBS newsroom suggest that morale wasn’t exactly sparkling under McMahon's leadership. The work environment was characterized by tension, with a palpable air of fear gripping employees who apparently preferred silence over serving as the next headline in an industry that thrives on boldness. One insider remarked that asking a question in a meeting sometimes felt as risky as signing a contract with a magician—you never quite know what’s going to disappear next.

Throughout her tenure, McMahon envisioned ambitious changes designed to elevate CBS News' standing and relevance. Unfortunately, like predicting the weather with a broken barometer, her plans collided with the old guard's more traditional approaches and a couple of cost-cutting measures that left everyone wondering if a press release was a suitable substitute for investigative journalism. McMahon highlighted the necessity for new leadership as a means of moving forward, reiterating that sometimes fresh eyes can at least help avoid walking into walls.

As CBS News charts a path that may or may not include a life raft, will there be a re-evaluation of journalistic priorities, or will the next CEO face significant challenges ahead? Whatever happens next in the tangled web of corporate maneuvers, one thing's for sure—there's a need for new leadership moving forward.