A House task force is investigating security failures in two assassination attempts against President-elect Donald Trump, with Secret Service Acting Director Ronald Rowe set to testify as a final report looms in December.

The investigation focuses on significant lapses during two incidents: a July 13 shooting at a Trump rally that left one dead and another foiled attempt on September 15. An interim report has already deemed the July incident 'preventable,' revealing critical shortcomings in communication and coordination between the Secret Service and local law enforcement. As concerns about the safety of federal officials rise, Chairman Mike Kelly highlights the task force's aim to restore public confidence in federal law enforcement.

During the July 13 incident, a gunman opened fire at a rally in which Trump was speaking, resulting in injuries to the President-elect and the tragic death of a rally attendee. This attack raised significant alarm about the security protocols in place to protect high-profile figures during public appearances. The ensuing investigation led to scrutiny of the effectiveness of measures implemented by the Secret Service and local authorities.

The interim report, released in October, critically analyzed the events leading up to the July incident. It pointed out a lack of comprehensive planning and coordination between the Secret Service and local law enforcement agencies assigned to the event. Specifically, fragmented lines of communication were identified as a crucial factor that allowed the gunman to evade immediate law enforcement response before he was able to open fire.

In response to the incident, acting Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe acknowledged the agency's need to improve its protocols to safeguard individuals under their protection. Rowe, who assumed leadership after the resignation of former Director Kimberly Cheatle, is expected to provide further details during his testimony. This change in leadership comes amid intense scrutiny of the Secret Service's performance and procedures, particularly following high-stakes incidents like the one involving Trump.

Following the assassination attempt in July, the task force expanded its investigation to include a second incident on September 15. During this occurrence, an individual armed with an AK-47-style weapon was apprehended near Trump’s golf course while he was on site. This attempt further highlighted the ongoing security threats faced by the President-elect and raised questions about the adequacy of safety measures being implemented in and around his public appearances.

The task force's investigation has involved collecting evidence through interviews and subpoenas directed at federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies. These efforts aim to piece together a comprehensive understanding of the security failures that occurred during both incidents. The investigation's findings are expected to provide critical insights into how such significant lapses can be avoided in the future to ensure the safety of not only Trump but other federal officials as well.

The culmination of this investigation will be presented in a final report anticipated to be released around December 13. Chairman Mike Kelly has stated that this report is vital for restoring public confidence in federal law enforcement, especially in light of recent events that have raised doubts about the safety protocols surrounding prominent political figures. His remarks reflect a widespread recognition of the need for accountability and transparency within agencies responsible for security.

As the country continues to navigate politically charged environments, the House task force's hearings are specifically focused on investigating assassination attempts against President-elect Donald Trump. The testimony from Secret Service Acting Director Ronald Rowe and the subsequent recommendations arising from the investigation are expected to address security failures during these incidents. Stakeholders watch closely, awaiting impactful changes that could enhance protective measures for elected officials in heightened-risk situations.