Supreme Court Justices' Financial Disclosures: From Bali Getaways to Beyoncé Get-Downs
When the Supreme Court justices decide to take a break from ruling on the Constitution, they apparently engage in activities that could rival the social calendars of pop culture’s elite. The 2023 financial disclosures from the Supreme Court reveal a tapestry of trips, gifts, and concert tickets that make the annual Oscars swag bag look like a goody bag from a children’s party.
Let's start with Justice Clarence Thomas who has put the "just" in "just lavish." Thomas formally disclosed 2019 trips to Bali, Indonesia, and the Bohemian Grove in California, all courtesy of billionaire Harlan Crow. These trips were suddenly deemed disclosure-worthy in 2023, which also might be the year someone carefully reminded him, "Oh, right, transparency!” The financial disclosure report was duly amended, ensuring that all jaunts are now blissfully accounted for.
Of course, Thomas' meticulous financial revealing didn’t stop at Bali retreats. He also disclosed receiving a charming little gift of $2,000 in photo albums from Terry Giroux. Nothing says "thank you for your service" quite like a pricey picture book, perhaps to reminisce about those warm Indonesian sunsets. And let's not overlook that the disclosures were filed with the assist of his accountant and ethics counsel. If one must navigate the morally murky waters of high-end trip reporting, best to have a pro.
On the opposite end of the judicial gift-receiving spectrum, we find Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who was presented with over $12,500 in donated art and four Beyoncé concert tickets worth more than $3,700. Evidently, Jackson isn’t just about the lawbooks—she’s about using her Formation to legislate a lot of fun as well. Who could blame her? Sometimes, to be a Supreme Court justice, you’ve got to join in on a Beyoncé Get-Down.
Book royalties formed a significant part of several justices' financial windfalls. The disclosures show that Ketanji Brown Jackson took home a hefty $893,750, Brett Kavanaugh pocketed $340,000, Neil Gorsuch added $250,000 to his coffers, and Sonia Sotomayor brought up the tail end with an $86,783 haul. Between the beach reading and a few poolside mojitos, it's fair to say these literary contracts are making quite the compelling case for authorship.
Then there's Justice Samuel Alito, who decided to toss a bit of intrigue into the mix by seeking a 90-day extension to file his financial report. Perhaps he's just perfecting the final draft or double-checking those receipts from his imaginary birthday party hosted by Iron Man. In any case, it’s worth the wait to see what financial plot twists may unfold there.
The Supreme Court’s financial disclosures came as the first since the court adopted a formal Code of Conduct last year, awakening a new chapter of ethics and possibly setting the stage for the next season of "Supreme Court Justices: The Real Disclosure Diaries." It’s worth noting that these measures were significantly prompted by Thomas' earlier, shall we say, underreported luxurious outings funded by Mr. Crow.
However, not all justices cashed in on opulence. Some noted they declined honorariums for various professional functions, illustrating a bit of propriety amidst the goodwill fiesta. Transparency seems to have taken root, even if it had to take the long road via some fine print.
In conclusion, the Supreme Court's 2023 financial disclosures revealed more than just numbers. They painted a surprising portrait of jet-setting and cultural engagements that you'd expect from Hollywood royalty rather than guardians of the Constitution. If these disclosures are any indicator, interpreting the law might just involve a bit of international travel and the occasional pop concert—assuming the gracious billionaire invites keep on rolling in.